Accurate electric vehicle (EV) charging demand forecasting is essential for stable grid operation and proactive EV participation in electricity market. Existing forecasting methods, particularly those based on graph neural networks, are often limited to modeling pairwise relationships between stations, failing to capture the complex, group-wise dynamics inherent in urban charging networks. To address this gap, we develop a novel forecasting framework namely HyperCast, leveraging the expressive power of hypergraphs to model the higher-order spatiotemporal dependencies hidden in EV charging patterns. HyperCast integrates multi-view hypergraphs, which capture both static geographical proximity and dynamic demand-based functional similarities, along with multi-timescale inputs to differentiate between recent trends and weekly periodicities. The framework employs specialized hyper-spatiotemporal blocks and tailored cross-attention mechanisms to effectively fuse information from these diverse sources: views and timescales. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that HyperCast significantly outperforms a wide array of state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of explicitly modeling collective charging behaviors for more accurate forecasting.

Despite the promising results of disentangled representation learning in discovering latent patterns in graph-structured data, few studies have explored disentanglement for hypergraph-structured data. Integrating hyperedge disentanglement into hypergraph neural networks enables models to leverage hidden hyperedge semantics, such as unannotated relations between nodes, that are associated with labels. This paper presents an analysis of hyperedge disentanglement from a category-theoretical perspective and proposes a novel criterion for disentanglement derived from the naturality condition. Our proof-of-concept model experimentally showed the potential of the proposed criterion by successfully capturing functional relations of genes (nodes) in genetic pathways (hyperedges).

How similar are model outputs across languages? In this work, we study this question using a recently proposed model similarity metric $κ_p$ applied to 20 languages and 47 subjects in GlobalMMLU. Our analysis reveals that a model's responses become increasingly consistent across languages as its size and capability grow. Interestingly, models exhibit greater cross-lingual consistency within themselves than agreement with other models prompted in the same language. These results highlight not only the value of $κ_p$ as a practical tool for evaluating multilingual reliability, but also its potential to guide the development of more consistent multilingual systems.

We show that deconfounding the similarity metrics increases the resolution of detecting functionally similar neural networks across domains.

Evaluating functional similarity involves quantifying the degree to which independently trained neural networks learn functionally similar representations. Reliably inferring the functional similarity of these networks remains an open problem with far-reaching implications for AI. Model stitching has emerged as a promising paradigm, where an optimal affine transformation aligns two models to solve a task, with the stitched model serving as a proxy for functional similarity. In this work, we draw inspiration from the knowledge distillation literature and propose Functional Latent Alignment (FuLA) as a novel optimality condition for model stitching. We revisit previously explored functional similarity testbeds and introduce a new one, based on which FuLA emerges as an overall more reliable method of functional similarity. Specifically, our experiments in (a) adversarial training, (b) shortcut training and, (c) cross-layer stitching, reveal that FuLA is less prone to artifacts tied to training on task cues while achieving non-trivial alignments that are missed by stitch-level matching.

--We propose Lib2V ec, a novel self-supervised framework to efficiently learn meaningful vector representations of library cells, enabling ML models to capture essential cell semantics. The framework comprises three key components: (1) an automated method for generating regularity tests to quantitatively evaluate how well cell representations reflect inter-cell relationships; (2) a self-supervised learning scheme that systematically extracts training data from Liberty files, removing the need for costly labeling; and (3) an attention-based model architecture that accommodates various pin counts and enables the creation of property-specific cell and arc embeddings. Experimental results demonstrate that Lib2V ec effectively captures functional and electrical similarities. Moreover, linear algebraic operations on cell vectors reveal meaningful relationships, such as vector(BUF) - vector(INV) + vector(NAND) approximating the vector of AND, showcasing the framework's nuanced representation capabilities. Lib2V ec also enhances downstream circuit learning applications, especially when labeled data is scarce. Library cell representations are vital for effective machine learning (ML)-based circuit analysis and optimization, as library cells are the fundamental building blocks of circuit netlists. Traditional methods often rely on manually defined features [1]-[4], requiring extensive expertise and feature engineering. Alternatively, one-hot encoding [5] demands large amounts of domain-specific training data, which may not always be available.

This study examines whether collective reasoning among generative agents can facilitate novel and coherent thinking that leads to innovation. To achieve this, it proposes GAI, a new LLM-empowered framework designed for reflection and interaction among multiple generative agents to replicate the process of innovation. The core of the GAI framework lies in an architecture that dynamically processes the internal states of agents and a dialogue scheme specifically tailored to facilitate analogy-driven innovation. The framework's functionality is evaluated using Dyson's invention of the bladeless fan as a case study, assessing the extent to which the core ideas of the innovation can be replicated through a set of fictional technical documents. The experimental results demonstrate that models with internal states significantly outperformed those without, achieving higher average scores and lower variance. Notably, the model with five heterogeneous agents equipped with internal states successfully replicated the key ideas underlying the Dyson's invention. This indicates that the internal state enables agents to refine their ideas, resulting in the construction and sharing of more coherent and comprehensive concepts.

Measuring the similarity of the internal representations of deep neural networks is an important and challenging problem. Model stitching has been proposed as a possible approach, where two half-networks are connected by mapping the output of the first half-network to the input of the second one. The representations are considered functionally similar if the resulting stitched network achieves good task-specific performance. The mapping is normally created by training an affine stitching layer on the task at hand while freezing the two half-networks, a method called task loss matching. Here, we argue that task loss matching may be very misleading as a similarity index. For example, it can indicate very high similarity between very distant layers, whose representations are known to have different functional properties. Moreover, it can indicate very distant layers to be more similar than architecturally corresponding layers. Even more surprisingly, when comparing layers within the same network, task loss matching often indicates that some layers are more similar to a layer than itself. We argue that the main reason behind these problems is that task loss matching tends to create out-of-distribution representations to improve task-specific performance. We demonstrate that direct matching (when the mapping minimizes the distance between the stitched representations) does not suffer from these problems. We compare task loss matching, direct matching, and well-known similarity indices such as CCA and CKA. We conclude that direct matching strikes a good balance between the structural and functional requirements for a good similarity index.

Mechanistic interpretability aims to provide human-understandable insights into the inner workings of neural network models by examining their internals. Existing approaches typically require significant manual effort and prior knowledge, with strategies tailored to specific tasks. In this work, we take a step toward automating the understanding of the network by investigating the existence of distinct sub-networks. Specifically, we explore a novel automated and task-agnostic approach based on the notion of functionally similar representations within neural networks, reducing the need for human intervention. Our method identifies similar and dissimilar layers in the network, revealing potential sub-components. We achieve this by proposing, for the first time to our knowledge, the use of Gromov-Wasserstein distance, which overcomes challenges posed by varying distributions and dimensionalities across intermediate representations--issues that complicate direct layer-to-layer comparisons. Through experiments on algebraic and language tasks, we observe the emergence of sub-groups within neural network layers corresponding to functional abstractions. Additionally, we find that different training strategies influence the positioning of these sub-groups. Our approach offers meaningful insights into the behavior of neural networks with minimal human and computational cost.